18 June1926
Disciple: There are two ways of foretelling the future: the
astrological calculations which are based upon the general lines of character
and happenings indicated by the stars, another is that of clairvoyance in which
the image of the future event, correct even to the minutest detail, is brought
before the vision. How does this happen?
Sri Aurobindo: These clairvoyants are awake on the physical plane and
because they are passive these images which are already there in the subtle
impose themselves upon their vision; of course, you .must have this vision in
order to know the future.
Disciple: Can the events, thus foreseen, be averted? Generally,
there is something always missing in the vision which does not allow men to
escape it, e.g., the, place or the time of the event is not indicated etc. But
there are some instances in which the foreknowledge of the event has allowed
the man to change the result foreseen.
Sri Aurobindo: There is a vital image which is a possibility and it can
be prevented; secondly there is the image of the event on the subtle physical
plane which, if it is fixed, can't be avoided.
Disciple: Are there events absolutely fixed which cannot be
changed?
Sri Aurobindo: Yes, there are. If you want to change then you have to
go to a plane which is higher than the one where these things are decided and
that is not always easy.
There are three kinds of movements which one has to distinguish in seeing the future. First of all there is the result of the actualities: it is a very narrow field and things there are fixed and it is generally the very near future. Secondly, there is a play of potentialities in which certain forces are struggling and you can see the force which is most likely to succeed. But generally it is that force which represents the higher decision on that plane. But you can't be always sure that it will succeed unless you know definitely that it represents the highest decision—the Truth. Thirdly there is a higher plane where important decisions are made. For that movement you have to go very high. It is difficult to distinguish between these three and most of the clairvoyants make a confusion.
Disciple: There are cases where most minute details have been
known by clairvoyance.
Sri Aurobindo: One has to be passive and often the decision to be
taken, or the happening that is going to take place, forces itself upon one.
Disciple: Is seeing the past the same faculty as seeing the
future?
Sri Aurobindo: Yes. But it is much easier to see the past. The
impression and memory are left on so many things.
Disciple: Is it the same thing that A.E. speaks of as the
"earth-memory" in one of his books.
Sri Aurobindo: What do you mean by the memory of the earth?
Disciple: All things leave their impression in the world and they
are all stored up in earth-consciousness. When A.E. was travelling in
Sri Aurobindo: That is something quite different from earth-memory.
Disciple: There is a being or a Spirit behind every place, I
believe; for instance, is there no conscious being behind
Sri Aurobindo: Do you mean nagar devatā, the presiding deity of the town?
Disciple: Something like that.
Sri Aurobindo: It is true that there are beings behind collective
units, like the nations. There is what you may call the national devatā or
National Shakti.
Disciple: Is there such a being behind
Sri Aurobindo: Yes.
Disciple: Is it possible to know it, to come in contact with it?
Disciple: Is it possible to know the future of the nation by
coming in contact with this being?
Sri Aurobindo: I think so. But I don't think the future is known that
way.
Disciple: Does it shape the future of the nation?
Sri Aurobindo: It has a part to play in it. It controls some of the
forces that act.
Disciple: Is this being something more than the aggregate
consciousness?
Sri Aurobindo: It has the aggregate consciousness and it has an
individualised consciousness of its own. It is not the determining deity or the
adhisthāta devatā in the sense
that it entirely shapes the future, but it, in a way, represents the racial —the national-soul.
Disciple: Is there any such thing as the evil genius of a nation?
Sri Aurobindo: This idea is akin to the Christian conception of good
and evil always counterbalancing each other and it corresponds to the old idea
of good and evil Spirits. But there is no such rule that wherever there is a
good Spirit there must be the evil Spirit.
28 June 1926
The
subject was miracles or acts that appear extraordinary in the life of great
spiritual persons. Raman Maharshi, the great Yogi of Tiruvannamalai, was once
beaten severely by robbers. They thought that he had a lot of money hidden
somewhere but as they failed to locate it they caught him and beat him. At last
they found only utensils, which they started taking. Raman Maharshi told them,
"But why don't you take some food which is ready, and then take the
utensils?" They did not listen to him and beat him. He fell into Samadhi and
his limbs were swollen with the beating. The police caught the burglars and
brought them before Raman Maharshi for identification, but he refused to
identify them.
Disciple: There is a story about Tailanga Swami, that once he was
beaten by robbers and the marks of the beating were found on the body of the
son of a robber.
Disciple: No. That version is not correct. The story is that a
prince was coming to take a bath in the
Disciple: Ramakrishna also had a similar experience when the
bullock that was being driven by the gardener was whipped in spite
Ramakrishna's protest; the marks of the whip were reproduced on Ramakrishna's
body
Disciple: The story in the Ramakrishna
Kathamrita is different. It refers to two fishermen who were
quarrelling. One of them gave a slap to the other on the back and Ramakrishna
who was on the bank got the mark of the slap on his body.
Sri Aurobindo: All these stories are there, the question is how many of
them are true.
Disciple: But apart from their being true or not, are they
possible?
SriAurobindo: I have already told you "anything is
possible", because the power of self-suggestion is practically unlimited.
There is the instance of St. Francis, of
Disciple: He also said that when he was living in sakhi-bhāva, the Radha attitude, he
developed feminine characteristics on his body
Disciple: But it is also said that you had the power of raising
the body from the ground!
Sri Aurobindo: Who told you?
Disciple: They say that when you were in jail and also at
Sri Aurobindo: Nonsense. And in X's writings perhaps I am represented
as walking above the ground. So you see how legends gather?
Disciple: But you yourself told me that it is true and not
nonsense. I asked you one day whether it was possible to raise the body from
the ground. You said it was and so I thought it was true in your case.
Sri Aurobindo: There you are! If I say something is possible does it
follow that it is actually done; for example, if I say it is possible to attain
physical immortality, does it mean that I have achieved it? Not at all.
Disciple: But then is there no basis at all for this widely held
report? I have heard it from reliable men.
Disciple: Those who start legends generally say they heard it from
a reliable source.
Disciple: But when you were in jail some part of your body was
raised in a peculiar fashion. Is that not true?
Sri Aurobindo: That was once in jail, I was then having a very intense
Sadhana on the vital plane and I was concentrated. I had a questioning mood,
whether such things as the Siddhi of utthapana—levitation—were possible. Then
suddenly I found myself raised up in such a way I could not have done it myself
with muscular exertion: only one part of the body was slightly in contact with
the ground and the rest was raised up against the wall and I know I could not
have held my body like that normally even if I had wanted to. I also found that
the body remained suspended like that without any exertion on my part. That is
the only thing that happened. In jail there were many such extraordinary and,
one may say, abnormal, experiences. As I was doing the Sadhana on the vital
plane I think the power might have come from there. All these experiences
passed away and did not repeat themselves.
Disciple: Moti Babu has related that when you were five years old
you got a vision of a great light at
Sri Aurobindo: And then, what happened further? (After some time) All that is a
legend. I told him something because he was constantly asking me about my
childhood. I had no such experience of light when I was a child. My uncle told
me that I was very bright, but I have no recollection of those days and if you
want the truth it was not light but darkness that I saw at
If people
were to know all the truth about my life they would never believe that such a
man could come to anything.
Disciple: Moti Babu related to me about your conversion to
Christianity—how one day when you did no attend Church the priest asked you
about it next day and then you did not make any reply but simply wept.
Sri Aurobindo: What is all this legend? I never became a Christian and
never used to go to Church. Who has built up this fantastic story?
Disciple: Moti Babu was telling us.
Sri Aurobindo: I told him something quite different and the manuscript
which he sent here did not contain any account of the light I saw when I was
five!
The only
thing that happened was there was once a meeting of non-Conformist priests at
Camberland when we were staying in
I was
feeling completely bored. Then a priest approached me and put me some
questions. I did not give any reply. Then they all shouted out, "He is
saved, he is saved," and began to pray for me and offer thanks to God! I
did not know anything. Then the priest came to me and asked me to pray. I was
never in the habit of praying but somehow I did it in the manner in which
children recite their prayers before sleep, in order to keep up an appearance.
That was the only thing. But I did not use to attend Church. I was then about
ten years. The old lady's son, Mr. Drewett never used to meddle in these
affairs because he was a man of common sense. But he went away to
When we
were staying in
I was a
great coward virtually and I was weak physically and could not do anything.
Only my will was bright. Nobody could have imagined that I could face the
gallows or carry on a revolutionary movement. In my case it was all human
imperfection with which I had to start and feel all the difficulties before
embodying the divine Consciousness.
Disciple: Moti Babu told us that you caught the revolutionary
spirit from Shelley's Revolt of Islam.
Sri Aurobindo: That is not quite true. The Revolt of Islam was a great favourite with me even when I
was quite young and I used to read it again and again—of course, without understanding
everything. Evidently it appealed to some part of the being. There was no other
effect of reading it except this that I had a thought that I would dedicate my
life to a similar World-change and take part in it.
(After a pause)
No, I had
no extraordinary spiritual experience in my early life.
I
remember only three experiences. One was the
Disciple: Is it a fact that you came away straight to
Chandernagore from the Dharma office? And that the C.I.D. by God's grace were
not there?
Sri Aurobindo: I was at the Karmayogin office and we came to know about
the search that was going to be made evidently with the object of arresting me.
There were some people there and Ramchandra Majumdar was there—preparing to
give fight to the police—and so many ideas were flying about when suddenly I
heard a voice from above saying, "No, go to Chandernagore."
After
coming out from Jail I used to hear voices and in those days I used to obey
them without questioning. So I told my friends that I would go to French India
and then the arrangement was made. The C.I.D., I don't know whether by God's
grace or the prostitutes' grace, were not there.
Disciple: Then about coming to
Sri Aurobindo: Yes. It is quite true.