Introduction

At the midnight hour of 14 August 1947 Jawaharlal Nehru spoke of the solemn promise of India awaking to life and freedom. At that moment of history he was claiming Independence from the British. “Long years ago we made a tryst with destiny, and now the time comes when we shall redeem our pledge...At the stroke of the midnight hour, when the world sleeps, India will awake to life and freedom. A moment comes, which comes but rarely in history, when we step out from the old to the new, when an age ends, and when the soul of a nation, long suppressed, finds utterance.” Sixty years have passed today and it is time for assessment and introspection, as to what extent the soul of India has been able to find its authentic and fulfilling utterance, to what extent the pledges made have been implemented. Has India awakened to the greatness of her soul? Indeed, what is it that constitutes the greatness of a nation’s soul? If truth-values found the greatness of a nation’s or an individual’s soul, the question is: Are we living in them?


Tagore had long ago such a poetic dream, that it seemed to almost come true: “I have loved India and sought to serve her not because of her geographical magnitude, not because of her great past, but because of my faith in her today and my belief that she will stand for truth and freedom and the higher things of life.” The giver of the national anthem wished India to speak words that come from the depth of truth. But when he was speaking about the “depth of truth” he was speaking not as a mystic but more as a poet:

 

Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high;

Where knowledge is free;

Where the world has not been broken up into fragments by narrow domestic walls;

Where the words come out from the depth of truth;

Where tireless striving stretches its arms towards perfection;

Where the clear stream of reason has not lost its way into the dreary desert and of dead habit;

Where the mind is led forward by Thee into ever-widening thought and action—

Into that heaven of freedom, my Father, let my country awake.

 

...Where the words come from the depth of truth ... words come from the depths of truth ... the Word comes from the depths of Truth: that is the mantra of life and existence. But do these words, these dreams of Tagore bear reality in the maze of life in which we live today? One wonders. Once, while he was walking on a street in London, a beggar asked for alms. Tagore pulled out something from his pocket and gave it to him. The beggar looked at it and said: “Sorry, Sir. This is a gold coin and what can I do with it? I need a small piece, please.” He returned the coin to the poet. Such poets! And such beggars! What sort of people do we have these days? It seems that there are very few Indians in India today. There are plenty of Americans in America, and there are plenty of Frenchmen in France, and Italians in Italy, and Germans in Germany; but there are very few Indians in India. That is India’s malaise, that is India’s tragedy. We have won freedom at the midnight hour, but our souls are still asleep, asleep in the sleep of inertia, of tamas. Can a corrupt society ever have a mind without fear? For Sri Aurobindo the question of India’s freedom was already settled, settled long ago; his concern, however, was, what India was going to do with her freedom. He had genuine apprehensions, of the Gunda Raj assailing the true destiny of the country. Have those apprehensions disappeared? They don’t seem to have.

 

Bankim’s Bande Mataram

In his address dated 29 January 1908 given at National School in Amaravati, in Maharashtra, Sri Aurobindo regretted that the meaning of Bankim’s Bande Mataram was not understood “because there was no patriotism except such as consisted in making India the shadow of England and other countries which dazzled the sight of the sons of this our Motherland with their glory and opulence. The so-called patriots of that time might have been the well-wishers of India but not men who loved her. One who loved his mother never looked to her defects, never disregarded her...” Even today, in this free India of ours, who comprehends the deep contents of that song, of that mantra?


Mother, I bow to thee!

Rich with thy hurrying streams,

Bright with thy orchard gleams,

Cool with thy winds of delight,

Dark fields waving, Mother of might,

Mother free.

Glory of moonlight dreams

Over thy branches and lordly streams,

Clad in thy blossoming trees,

Mother, giver of ease,

Laughing low and sweet!

Mother, I kiss thy feet,

Speaker sweet and low!

Mother, to thee I bow…

 

Rich with thy hurrying streams,

Bright with thy orchard gleams,

Dark of hue, O candid-fair

In thy soul, with jewelled hair

And thy glorious smile divine,

Loveliest of all earthly lands,

Showering wealth from well-stored hands!

Mother, mother mine!

Mother sweet, I bow to thee,

Mother great and free.

 

Is there anyone today who cries “Mother, mother mine, mother great and free”? In his speech, Sri Aurobindo said that he was exceedingly pleased that the song had become popular in all parts of India, that it was being repeatedly sung everywhere. The song, he asserted, was not only a national anthem to be looked on as the European nations look upon their own, but one replete with mighty power, being a sacred mantra, revealed to us by one who might be called an inspired Rishi. He also explained that “the mantra was not an invention, but a revivification of the old mantra which had become extinct”, because of our treachery. “He then concluded the speech,” says the reporter, “with an appeal to true patriotism and exhorted the audience to love the Motherland and sacrifice everything to bring about her salvation.” Is it the same today? So it seems.


And yet there is something interesting about Bande Mataram. About five years ago the BBC conducted an online survey of world’s top ten songs. Response from 155 countries showed that, following the Irish National Anthem, Bande Mataram got second position. 

 

About Bankim and his song composed in 1875: “Bankim Chandra was among the first batch of graduates from Calcutta University. Soon after he had secured his BA, he was appointed as Deputy Magistrate, and eventually became a Deputy Collector. In his work, he had ready access to old papers and gazettes, and came across the documents related to the mutiny of Sannyasis in Dhaka, North Bengal, Nepal, Tarai, Dinajpur, Rangpur, and Purniya during the period from 1763 to 1780. He decided to write a novel, Anandmaţh, based on the heroic deeds of these Sannyasis. In his youth, he had witnessed the unsuccessful mutiny of 1857.  Around 1870, the British rulers were trying hard to force their anthem, God Save the Queen, on Indians. This made a deep impact on Bankim’s sensitive mind, and he wrote Bande Mataram in one sitting, in a mood that must be called transcendental. He wrote the song as a prayer in which the nation 'Bharat' was described as 'The Mother'. The song was later included in his novel Anandmaţh, which was published serially in his magazine Bangdarshan during 1880-1882. The song was heavily criticized by his friends, and also by his daughter, for the words were difficult to pronounce, and the song comprised of a mixture of Bengali and Sanskrit words. He argued that he wrote it spontaneously to express his emotions and thoughts without caring for its future. However, like a prophet, he said, ‘I may not live to see its popularity, but this song will be sung by every Indian like a Ved Mantra.’ And that is exactly what happened after the partition of Bengal in 1905.”

 

But there are voices which continue to object Bande Mataram as the National Anthem. Here is RC Majumdar, objective and bone-dry: "During the long and arduous struggle for freedom from 1905 to 1947 Bande Mataram was the rallying cry of the patriotic sons of India, and thousands of them succumbed to the laţhi blow of the British police or mounted the scaffold with Bande Mataram on their lips… [But there is] no doubt that Bankim Chandra's nationalism was Hindu rather than Indian. This is made crystal clear from his other writings which contain passionate outbursts against the subjugation of India by the Muslims.” Did Bankim convert patriotism into religion, and religion into patriotism? No wonder, secular Jawaharlal Nehru rejected Bande Mataram as the National Anthem. There is a problem about Bande Mataram when we see it the context of a multi-ethnic multi-religious society of a nation. But nor is secularism of the western mode a solution.  However, let us see, contextually, Sri Aurobindo’s view about India.

 

Sri Aurobindo ‘madnesses’

Speaking about one of his ‘madnesses’ Sri Aurobindo says: “…whereas others regard the country as an inert object, and know it as the plains, the fields, the forests, the mountains and rivers, I look upon my country as the mother, I worship her and adore her as the mother. What would a son do when a demon sitting on the breast of his mother is drinking her blood? Would he sit down content to take his meals, and go on enjoying himself in the company of his wife and children, or would he, rather, run to the rescue of his mother? I know I have the strength to uplift this fallen race; it is not physical strength, I am not going to fight with the sword or with the gun, but with the power of knowledge. The power of the warrior is not the only kind of force, there is also the power of Brahman which is founded on knowledge. This is not a new feeling within me, it is not of a recent origin, I was born with it; it is in my very marrow. God sent me to the earth to accomplish this great mission.”

 

“I know I have the strength to uplift this fallen race… This is not a new feeling within me… I was born with it… God sent me to the earth to accomplish this great mission.” In that mission, in the fire of that determination, in the Yajna of Freedom, was born Indian nationalism, in it was given the liberating mantra, Bande Mataram.

 

Came great souls chanting the Hymn of Freedom. Let us take an example, of young Jatin Mukherjee’s. Hardly was he in his teens, and he was aware that his mission in life was to fight for the freedom of his Motherland. A great share of the credit of this spirit of his must go to his mother who was a widow. Of a powerful build and with commitment to principles, his approach was that of the revolutionary’s. For him the use of bombs and firearms was perfectly in order in the struggle for freedom. On one occasion he was in prison for fifteen months, but for want of proof the government was helpless and he was released. In the first decade of the last century a whole group of young hearts sacrificed their lives for this great cause. It seems, special souls had taken birth at the time. Even as Sri Aurobindo was sent by God, they, his ageless companions, came following him to accomplish the mission. It was the Hour of God, indeed, and weighty and historic things happened in the swiftness of time. A whole nation awoke to the truth of her soul.

 

The spirit that inspired the time can be put in Sri Aurobindo’s words as follows: “There are times in a nation's history when Providence places before it one work, one aim, to which everything else, however high and noble in itself, has to be sacrificed. Such a time has now arrived for our Motherland when nothing is dearer than her service, when everything else is to be directed to that end. If you will study, study for her sake; train yourselves body and mind and soul for her sake. You will go abroad to foreign lands that you may bring back knowledge with which you may do service to her. Work, that she may prosper. Suffer, that she may rejoice. All is contained in that one single advice.”

 

We must recognise that India is a land of richness, of plenty. She is rich in every respect. She is plenteous materially, vitally, mentally, spiritually. The Veda spoke of corn filled with milk in her fields. She is Bankim’s land of hurrying streams and bright orchard gleams, sujalām-suphalām. Here flourished great kingdoms, here flourished arts and sciences and crafts, here grew industry, commerce, trade. From here sailed ships to far oceans. From here spread wisdom and knowledge all over the world. This has been the ancient land of tapasya.

 

India is rich

Even today India is rich in every respect. Indians may be poor but India is not poor. The soul of the country is as bright as the sun in a clear cloudless summer sky. But it is unfortunate that we do not live in it. We do not live in the brightness of that splendour, in its wonderful day. We do not know our own souls. We have lost contact with our inner being. We are sleeping the dark sleep of mediaeval ages. The unfortunate history of the last thousand years is weighing heavily on our mind and heart and body, on our spirit. But the backlash of time must be set aright. We must return to the foundational principles and values of our nation. We must see the causes, as to where exactly we had failed. We must awake to the call of Vivekananda, of Prabuddha Bharata, to the inspiration and message of Eternal India.

 

Let us see what happened during the last couple of centuries. Emperor Shahjahan spent crores of rupees in seven years to get his famous peacock throne made. It was studded with some of the costliest precious stones, with rare diamonds and emeralds. But alas! It is no more there now. The raider Nadir Shah was attracted by it and took it away with him. Later the East India Company snatched it from us and shipped it to England. But it was not to reach that plunderers’ destination. The ship carrying it sank in the sea, and the attempt to recover it proved futile.

 

And about the Taj Mahal? The labour cost alone, by today’s wages, comes to about Rs. 2000 crores. 20,000 workers toiled for 22 years and 1000 elephants were employed to transport the construction material. No doubt here is a piece of wonder, enchanting in its life-breathing lyricism. But, then, that is how the taxpayers’ money was squandered.

 

The ancient Indian precepts of governance were different. They affirmed that the taxes collected from the citizens represent the wages of the king. These were paid to him for the performance of kingly duties, duties towards the people of the kingdom. He was expected to give them protection. He was expected to maintain law and order. He was expected to promote activities of trade and commerce. Indeed, he must prop up not only arts and sciences and industries, but also culture. He stands for values and must unswervingly uphold these. Performance of kingly duties, and not enjoyment or satisfying one’s own wants and wishes—that is the role of the king as a public servant.

 

But during the period of recent history, of some thousand years, India slipped into a terrible abyss of darkness. Invasion after relentless invasion sucked away the vitality of the country. The bright days of abundant prosperity turned into the nights of spiritual and cultural destitution. When Europe was making giant strides in various walks of life, India remained covered under the tamas of the age. Foolish battles were fought and won for foolish gains. We were in deep unforgivable sleep.

 

On 23 June 1757—tomorrow it will be 252 years ago—in the Battle of Plassey Siraj-ud-Daula, the Nawab of Bengal, was defeated by Robert Clive, defeated by very dubious means. Another dishonour was inflicted on the psyche of the country. Clive claimed from the successor Mir Jafar the crony £40 million and a huge personal revenue of £30,000 a year. India was since then steadily and systematically plundered and reduced to a lifeless object. The land of rich hurrying streams and bright orchard gleams, sujalām-suphalām, became a forlorn country, as if forsaken by the Goddess of Greatness. The Plassey War Memorial is a constant reminder of the humiliation and impoverishment India suffered during the colonial days. “It is a country of inexhaustible riches and one which cannot fail to make its masters the richest corporation in the world.” This is what Clive wrote back home after arriving in India. Since then there has been the methodical “transfer of poverty” to that country of inexhaustible riches. The last ten centuries were the worst in Indian history. Hard is it to get rid of this karma.

 

Queen Victoria acquired the title ‘Empress of India’ in 1877, even as Macaulay told the British Parliament: “I have travelled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country such high moral values, people of such caliber, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation.” Has much changed today from this? Not really. We consider education as a human resources development and create artificial issues of reservations, dividing the society into endless classes and groups, instead of asserting what even Macaulay discerned as “spiritual and cultural heritage”. He sensed something great and enduring about it, something noble and elevating, something that can withstand the shocks of bad times. Our so-called secularists have the least notion of it. The very phrase “human resources development” is so degrading, so repugnant that it makes an individual a tradable commodity; the individuality of the individual is absent in it. We ought to get the integral view of life in all our thousand occupations, prepare the individuals as souls with precious expectations and aspirations, that we fulfil ourselves as individuals, we fulfil as members of a larger collectivity, we fulfil God in us and in the world and in the universal manifestation. Unless that is achieved, we would not have found the true meaning of freedom; we might have thrown away the colonial rule, but we would not have established the rule of life in the nobility of the spirit. And just imagine! When Bhimsen Joshi made a rendering of Bande Mataram in the Parliament, not too long ago, our honourable Members of Parliament clapped enthusiastically at the end. Does one clap when the National Anthem is sung? When Churchill exhorted his people “never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense,” he was showing great character of his well-developed and mature personality, reflecting his nation's. We lack it and the real question to be answered is: “Why do we really lack it?” The purpose of education is to help a child grow into a “straightforward, frank, upright and honourable” human being to fulfil himself in life and in his soul and in his spirit. The rest are simply tools and techniques. We mistake the latter for education and miss the real purpose of education.