Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: In Defence of the “Extracts from The Lives of Sri Aurobindo by Peter Heehs”—Raman Reddy
by
auroman
A historian relies only on primary-source documents and nothing else to analyze the surface life of a Mahayogi who has specifically said his action was exclusively on the inner planes. Can anyone see the fallacy in the approach ?
This book is not Aurobindonian but Ozymandian in nature!
More on the aspiration, rejection, surrender aspect in a few days.