You are right - just like everyone else, if we use the correct meta-ethical theory. I was trying to say that we need to free Yoga from this loathsome Puducherry sacerdotal club which is trying to suffocate us by creating a new religion. Everyone is free to have their own personal representation created using an independent normative axiological method. If someone wants to deliberately throw mud on Sri Aurobindo and then scrub it, then it is their unique right to do so. Sri Aurobindo's contributions to evolutionary transformation will be better understood if scholars can objectively analyze his life without restraints from a transhumanistic, neo-scholastic or even ethical subjectivist perspective. Flexible forms of hermeneutics and dialectics will have to be invented to define a new spiritual culture. Ahh...I can't go on :-) For some time, I have been trying to understand the "flexible mind" of some supporters of our historian and now I have finally got it. It is a mind which rejects all Shastra, Guru, etc in exchange for worlds of pleasant mental formations.